(no subject)
Aug. 26th, 2004 11:42 amFrom here, a surpisingly accurate relationship quizthing:
Note that both Physical/Intellectual and Giver/Taker are actually even splits; I don't want to post all four of the possibilities this yields, though, as that'd be way too much quizzitude. If you're curious, go take it yourself. (You have to take it before you can see the other options.)
eXpressive: 9/10
Practical: 2/10
Physical: 5/10
Giver: 5/10
You are a XSIT--Expressive Sentimental Intellectual Taker. This makes you a Hellcat.
Yowza, you are fiery to be with. You're dynamic and volatile and a living roller coaster. You're also very attractive and immaculately groomed, so your target sex gets drawn in like a moth. You love the attention and never get tired of it. At a party you command attention, but you're a lightweight with alcohol and if you drink too much there can be trouble.
Like an XSYT, you tend to over-analyze things, so the slightest comment or action from your significant other can send you into a tailspin. Conflict with you can be either very productive or very dangerous. You are incapable of lying -- you have no guile -- and if your partner can't handle the truth, that's his/her problem, not yours. You are explosive when you're upset, but when the smoke clears you are right back on track with no ill will.
This is a highly effective way to resolve issues and keep them from brewing, but this can stun and hurt a partner with a more laid-back approach. You aren't angry later, but s/he might be. Make sure when you've gotten your satisfaction that your partner is satisfied as well!
You would never cheat. But combine your hot-blooded style with the fact that your partner is *attracted* to that style, and you've got a recipe for being cheated on. If you pair up with an X_YG (and that's not unlikely) you may get caught in his/her cycle of cheating. Make sure your partner feels appreciated and loved to balance out the fire of your approach to conflict.
If you're female, you're kind of like Evita or Teresa Heinz Kerry. I can't think of any famous men like this.
Of the 8047 people who have taken this quiz, 7 % are this type.
Eh, why not toss in the other while I'm at it:
Wackiness: 60/100
Rationality: 74/100
Constructiveness: 50/100
Leadership: 30/100
You are a WRDF--Wacky Rational Destructive Follower. This makes you a Hacker.
Your thirst for knowledge can be damaging to your possessions--you like to take things apart, even if you then forget to put them back together. You demand respect and, no matter how much you are respected, seldom feel it is adequate. You are tenacious, and will stick to a task long after weaker minds have given it up.
Socially, you are awkward, and get into arguments and make people uncomfortable. One recommends counting to ten, holding back comments unless warranted, and listening more than speaking. Still, your no-holds-barred approach to socialization can be strangely endearing, as long as you are funny and self-deprecating.
You feel misunderstood, and you probably are.
Of the 5519 people who have taken this quiz since tracking began (8/17/2004), 2.2 % are this type.
Note that both Physical/Intellectual and Giver/Taker are actually even splits; I don't want to post all four of the possibilities this yields, though, as that'd be way too much quizzitude. If you're curious, go take it yourself. (You have to take it before you can see the other options.)
eXpressive: 9/10
Practical: 2/10
Physical: 5/10
Giver: 5/10
You are a XSIT--Expressive Sentimental Intellectual Taker. This makes you a Hellcat.
Yowza, you are fiery to be with. You're dynamic and volatile and a living roller coaster. You're also very attractive and immaculately groomed, so your target sex gets drawn in like a moth. You love the attention and never get tired of it. At a party you command attention, but you're a lightweight with alcohol and if you drink too much there can be trouble.
Like an XSYT, you tend to over-analyze things, so the slightest comment or action from your significant other can send you into a tailspin. Conflict with you can be either very productive or very dangerous. You are incapable of lying -- you have no guile -- and if your partner can't handle the truth, that's his/her problem, not yours. You are explosive when you're upset, but when the smoke clears you are right back on track with no ill will.
This is a highly effective way to resolve issues and keep them from brewing, but this can stun and hurt a partner with a more laid-back approach. You aren't angry later, but s/he might be. Make sure when you've gotten your satisfaction that your partner is satisfied as well!
You would never cheat. But combine your hot-blooded style with the fact that your partner is *attracted* to that style, and you've got a recipe for being cheated on. If you pair up with an X_YG (and that's not unlikely) you may get caught in his/her cycle of cheating. Make sure your partner feels appreciated and loved to balance out the fire of your approach to conflict.
If you're female, you're kind of like Evita or Teresa Heinz Kerry. I can't think of any famous men like this.
Of the 8047 people who have taken this quiz, 7 % are this type.
Eh, why not toss in the other while I'm at it:
Wackiness: 60/100
Rationality: 74/100
Constructiveness: 50/100
Leadership: 30/100
You are a WRDF--Wacky Rational Destructive Follower. This makes you a Hacker.
Your thirst for knowledge can be damaging to your possessions--you like to take things apart, even if you then forget to put them back together. You demand respect and, no matter how much you are respected, seldom feel it is adequate. You are tenacious, and will stick to a task long after weaker minds have given it up.
Socially, you are awkward, and get into arguments and make people uncomfortable. One recommends counting to ten, holding back comments unless warranted, and listening more than speaking. Still, your no-holds-barred approach to socialization can be strangely endearing, as long as you are funny and self-deprecating.
You feel misunderstood, and you probably are.
Of the 5519 people who have taken this quiz since tracking began (8/17/2004), 2.2 % are this type.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-26 01:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-26 11:20 pm (UTC)Small world.
Apparently, I'm a Blue Screen of Death
Date: 2004-08-26 02:36 pm (UTC)Practical: 6/10
Physical: 7/10
Giver: 4/10
Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80040e14'
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]The log file for database 'hokev' is full. Back up the transaction log for the database to free up some log space.
/quiz/inc/relationship.inc, line 297
Hi, random comment
Date: 2004-09-07 11:52 pm (UTC)I friended you because we have several things in common, and not a few people in common. I lived in the Bay Area for a year, during which I dated
As I was cruising through your webpage, I realized from your age that you probably also went to NCSSM at such a time that you might have known my ex-roommate, Jackie. For some reason, probably having to do with lack of shower and coffee as I type this, I'm utterly blanking on her last name. It may well be Allen. She went to CWRU after she graduated. She dated a guy named Andrew who went to U Mich @ Ann Arbor.
So, I hope you don't mind me friending you. Feel free to do likewise.
Re: Hi, random comment
Date: 2004-09-08 03:54 pm (UTC)Re: Hi, random comment
Date: 2004-09-09 03:52 am (UTC)Indeed, I did know Lissa. We were never close, but we ran in the same circles.
Anybody else we know in common? In that pic you look an awful lot like my friend Kathleen, but given that she lives in Champaign, IL, I doubt you know her.