(no subject)
Feb. 6th, 2008 05:39 pmMy insurance says the truck is totaled; hers hasn't looked yet, but I'm sure they'll concur. So, I'm taking suggestions on my next car! 2-4 years old, probably, fuel efficient but zippy enough for SoCal freeway driving, not too expensive. I prefer something aesthetically pleasing, but I'll take what I can get. I know some of you are car people; any tips on what to look at?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 02:00 am (UTC)you *might* be better off, especially where you are, getting a late 70s to mid 80s datsun or toyota and having a full rebuild (so, a $1,000 car with a $2,000 "make it new" - not popular, but you live in the right place to do it- no rust, no road salt, and you can get the body and interior done dirt cheap with a trip to TJ
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 02:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 02:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 02:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 02:34 am (UTC)We have the Wagon which holds a Ton of Crap for going to cons.
I also love my Prius, but that won't be cheap even at 3 years old.
Lists from Consumer Reports
Under $4000
Chevrolet Prizm ‘98; Tracker ‘98
Ford Escort ‘99
Geo Prizm ’97
Mazda Protegé ‘97-98
Mercury Tracer ‘99
Subaru Impreza ‘97
Suzuki Sidekick ‘98
$4-6K
Acura CL ‘97-98; Integra ’97; TL ‘97
Chevrolet Prizm ‘99-00; Tracker ‘99
Ford Crown Victoria ’98; Escort ’02; F-150 ‘97
Honda Accord ’97; Civic ‘97-98; CR-V ’97; Odyssey ‘97
Isuzu Oasis ‘97-98
Mazda B-Series (2WD) ’98; Millenia ’98; Protegé ‘99-00
Mercury Grand Marquis ‘98
Mitsubishi Galant ‘00
Nissan 200SX ’97; 240SX ’97; Altima ’98; Frontier ’98; Maxima ’97; Pathfinder ’97; Pickup ‘97; Sentra ’97, ‘99
Saturn SL ’99; SW ‘99
Subaru Impreza ’98; Legacy ‘97-98
Suzuki Grand Vitara ‘99
Toyota Avalon ’97, Camry ’97; Celica ’97; Corolla ‘97-99; Echo ’00; RAV4 ‘97-98; Sienna ’98; Tacoma ‘97
I can grab higher up if you need it. I'm a subscriber.
There are No Hondas or Toyotas on their Consistently Bad Bets list.
That should get you started at any rate.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 03:20 am (UTC)Other than that, the Toyota Corolla is always a good bet if you can find one, as is the Honda Civic. The small Mazdas are also good cars if you can find one.
Civic
Date: 2008-02-07 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 03:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 03:42 am (UTC)For the cost of a used Prius...
Date: 2008-02-07 04:17 am (UTC)If she could wait until the 2009-model-year Honda Fit comes out though, I'd call that the best option, they're upgrading the engine so it'll get 120hp but the same gas mileage, and basically the same vehicle otherwise.
Re: For the cost of a used Prius...
Date: 2008-02-07 04:19 am (UTC)Re: For the cost of a used Prius...
Date: 2008-02-07 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 04:36 am (UTC)From experience I can tell you their offer's not likely to anywhere near cover the cost of a replacement. You'll want to find listings for the same make, model and year to argue them up some. That'll be just their collision coverage. Since this isn't your insurance, there's also their liability coverage. You'll need a lawyer for that part of it, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:02 am (UTC)Re: For the cost of a used Prius...
Date: 2008-02-07 05:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:04 am (UTC)Re: Civic
Date: 2008-02-07 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:10 am (UTC)Re: For the cost of a used Prius...
Date: 2008-02-07 05:27 am (UTC)And the only crash-test the Yaris Liftback did poorly on AFAIK was the side-impact if it didn't have the side-curtain airbags, you're a very tall individual, and someone in an equally-tall SUV plows into it in a perfect T-Bone. The door itself didn't buckle in that crash-test thanks to the crash-bar, and for front/rear crashes it did quite well. Hell, it was one of the best options if you're going to be rear-ended. =^.^=
Also, please remember that the Yaris Liftback and the Yaris Sedan don't share any components except the engine and transmission, which is the same one as the Prius in both cases. Even when they look similair (like the dashboard) they don't share any components at all. The Liftback (Vitz elsewhere) was designed in Europe, the Sedan (Belta elsewhere) was designed in Japan. That they get to share crash-test results in many cases abhors me, they don't share any body or structural parts at all. =-.-=
Yeesh...
Date: 2008-02-07 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 06:22 am (UTC)Under $4000
Mazda Protegé ‘97-98
[snip]
$4-6K
Mazda B-Series (2WD) ’98; Millenia ’98; Protegé ‘99-00
My boss had a ?98 Mazda Protege. She LOVED it. I can't remember the mileage but it was up there.
I had a '92 Mazda B2600i. It had almost 300K when we sold it. It was still running but had major problems (I put 250K on it in the ~ 9 years we owned it). It was the BEST truck EVER. It survived a couple of accidents. I would have bought another Mazda truck but (even the king cab) they're a little small for
Re: For the cost of a used Prius...
Date: 2008-02-07 07:30 am (UTC)Pretty sure that's false. It might use the same 1.5L block, but even that is unlikely (since the Prius uses an offset Atkinson 4-stroke cycle, not the typical Otto cycle).
And the Prius "transmission" exists only in the joining of the electric motor/generators and the internal combustion engine -- hence, you can't get "a Prius transmission" without also getting a hybrid.
Don't get me wrong; I feel that, if you can afford it and if it fits your lifestyle, the Honda Fit / Yaris liftback / Nissan Versa are all great bets (pretty much in that order, though, if I recall the Consumer Reports list correctly). Sadly still in the 10-15k$ range, which might be more than
And used Prii are hideously expensive, and likely to just go up in value (given that SoCal will be staring down 4$/USgal gas this year). If I didn't love my 2005 so much, I'd try to sell it at the peak of the summer market -- expensive gas, and I have the HOV stickers. :) With 50k miles, I might still manage to get close to 20k$ for that combo. :-/
Re: For the cost of a used Prius...
Date: 2008-02-07 07:50 am (UTC)You're right though, the Prius has no transmission as such. =^.^= And considering the Yaris can out-do the Prius for many people on highway trips, they're selling used with 12k for a one-year-old for as much as they sold for new at the dealership, from what I'm seeing on-line in many places. =O.o=
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 08:44 am (UTC)Agree Toyota/Honda both have vehicles that last a long time and keep on going. Also if you go the Corola/Civic route, there are lots and lots of parts avail.
Chevy/Geo Prizm: We loved ours, but they have issue with the alternator needing to be replaced every 2-3 year, per our experience and our mechanice. Also, our brakes needed work every year we had the car.
Re: For the cost of a used Prius...
Date: 2008-02-07 09:12 am (UTC)I'm not meaning to hammer on you, but can you offer me a source on this? My understanding is that the current (2004-present) Prius uses the Atkinson 4-stroke cycle, which no other production vehicle does. So "mechanically the same" would have to exclude crankshaft offset and camshaft timing (let alone the iVVT magic that the Prius includes).
And again, let me reiterate that I'm not anti-Yaris; for its segment, the Yaris and the Fit are both excellent choices, and I will happily applaud anyone who chooses economy and fitness-to-task over "i have an SUV, hear me roar!" status/image bullshit.
When the rubber hits the road, however, I expect a Yaris to turn in about 40mpg on the canonical
Does
(If anything, the indecision now is whether to wait for 2009 or 2010 models that might have Li-Ion batteries and/or plug-in ("PHEV") capabilities. In the face of "what can I buy this week", however, recent Prii are still excellent options for people with long, predictable commutes, especially in temperate climates.)
Re: For the cost of a used Prius...
Date: 2008-02-07 09:14 am (UTC)John Davis drove an Echo, too. At least, until he got in a crash.
Re: For the cost of a used Prius...
Date: 2008-02-07 11:04 am (UTC)As for the engines, that part's easy. They both use the 1.5l Toyota NZ-series engine, with the Prius using the same mechanism as the VVT-i components to highly retard the intake cams, which is how it does it's Atkinson cycle. The Yaris (and most other 1NZ-FE engine vehicles) uses the same mechanism to vary the cam timing for more even torque across the board and across various loads.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 03:26 pm (UTC)Re: For the cost of a used Prius...
Date: 2008-02-07 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 07:37 pm (UTC)Front wheels- on front wheel drive cars the front wheels are VERY VERY moveable- as they have to be able to be driven (deliver power from the drive train to the earth) at constantly shifting angles. so it's extremely unlikely that the whole wheel and (flexible because it S tttttttttttt) drive shaft/axle assembly could come off. Bend? YES! because it is designed to- it has to to run on anything other than straight rails.
So what's keeping it "level" so to speak is the strut and shock system. if an accident breaks that system, it's probably going to look pretty ugly, like a wheel sitting at a 45 degree angle. But that's not anything in the car breaking except part of the suspension. Which is actually a good design consideration, since the suspension system gives a time-effect absortion of stress before failure.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 07:41 pm (UTC)I'd also suggest, if you want to look at gasoline and mileage, a used Mini, or a relatively recenty jetta. If you cna find a used deisel jetta in nearly any condition, get it- and find a shop that deals with deisel volkswagens. You'll get your 40+ mpg right there.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 07:45 pm (UTC)It's looking like an '04-06 Civic Hybrid may be feasible, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 09:01 pm (UTC)They hold value very well, which is both a blessing and a curse. Means that the 3-4 year old models aren't going to be all that cheap, but if you drive it for 5 years and want to sell it again, you can still get a decent chunk of your money back.
I would definately go with either Toyota or Honda over just about anything else, though. The reliability of Japanese engineering is absolutely worth it. Just comparing my Camry to my dad's cars, he spends a lot more time and money on service. (He likes big cars with even bigger engines, and American companies still tend to make the best muscle cars. Personally, I just want to get from point A to point B with a minimum fuss, and the Camry does it beautifully.)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-08 05:59 pm (UTC)I'll cut to the chase here:
Date: 2008-02-08 08:26 pm (UTC)I did this dance a few months ago when repairs to my Malibu ('97 with 200K miles on it) finally reached the red-zone of "replace NOW". I spent the better part of a month on my own crash course of "Used Cars 101" since I hadn't bought used since my first vehicle in '73 (and, that, back home with friends around whom I trusted to help me make sure I wasn't getting screwed in the process).
Short form (much research with Consumer Reports, manufacturer websites, various on-line sources, etc.): For the class and price range I was looking at, Honda and Toyota came out head and shoulders above any of the others for cost vs. safety, stability, economy, enviro-friendliness, longevity (I keep my vehicles for 10+ years), etc. I didn't even give thought to Lexus, Infiniti, BMW, MErcedes, etc. Sooooooo not in my zone!
I was looking at something in the Corolla/Civic range for size (small enough to be economical but big enough to fit stuff/people in). I don't feel the need to go larger (need a trunk for stuff and room for a couple of passengers from time to time but don't want/need a boat!) and don't feel secure (vs. other vehicles in an impact, vs. wind/weather/road conditions, etc.) or comfortable (tiny = no room for me/storage and claustrophobic) in a smaller vehicle. I really didn't want a hatchback (or whatever else they're calling them this year) as I had one in the past. I *like* a separate trunk!
[A quick side-note on going smaller: The smaller, sub-compact, economy cars do cost less and look nice. Some even drive nicely as well. However, buyer beware. You'll find that stuff that's standard on the next size up has become an optional (pricey) extra - things like ABS brakes, side-curtain airbags, automatic transmission, etc., etc., etc. Once you've bought those things so you feel safe, you still have less (smaller, etc.) car for more money.]
I wanted to go hybrid but couldn't afford to and discovered that a good traditional engine can get me mileage that isn't much less so the long-term cost-effectiveness balances out. (Hybrid initial cost is higher and doesn't quite balance out vs. gas prices over the life of the vehicle.) If initial cost weren't such a factor, I'd be willing to pay a little more to be "greener", but . . .
Honda is great but, generally, a little pricier than Toyota. More important to me, in the end, it still has a *very* high theft rate - get a wonderful car for someone else to steal? I think *not*! Buy a security system to protect it? Now the price is too high. However, they both rate at the top end of affordable cars which are safe, dependable and, on average, *LAST* for a long while without massive, expensive repairs.
Toyota (because, by now, I knew which manufacturer I wanted) also makes the Yaris (as has been stated elsewhere). It's kind of cute but didn't ride as well for me as the Corolla and, to bring it up to the safety level of the Corolla would have made it cost more. Given that you do a lot less distance driving than I do and you're mostly a commuter, if you can get over the loss of safety features, you may be able to get a new one for the price of a used Corolla. Toyota was *really* pushing them a couple of weeks ago.
Edited to clarify and correct what I didn't catch before I posted. *sigh*
Part 2 *sigh*
Date: 2008-02-08 09:02 pm (UTC)...and, a few final notes:
[Another "Note" here: If you didn't know already, *always* ask to see the CarFax report on any used car you're thinking about. It'll forewarn you of problems - damages, flood, multiple owners, etc.]
While I will be more than happy to recommend my Enterprise location and/or Toyota dealership, you can also do a fair bit of hunting at Yahoo Autos and through the Kelley Blue Book site. However, I avoided like the plague private sellers and car wholesalers in the interests of also avoiding getting the shaft.
http://autos.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTE5MGRqZDdoBF9TAzI3MTYxNDkEc2VjA2ZwLXRyb3VnaARzbGsDc3Bpcml0LWZpeGVk
http://www.kbb.com/kbb/UsedCars/default.aspx
I'm getting a steady 30+mpg with my style of driving and occasional use of air conditioning (not that I've needed much of that the last few weeks). Also, before I bought, I checked with my insurance company to find out what my rate would be. For instance, though it didn't have a top rating, the Ford Focus really caught my eye (and is a *very* pleasant ride) and wasn't badly priced. However, I would have bumped my insurance premium up by almost 50% over the Corolla. Also, even though the Yaris is a less expensive vehicle, it insures at a higher premium. Ditto the Kia Spectra (Probably due to the fact that they are not inherently as safe and/or there are fewer of them so repairs cost more.)
Last week, after the insurance company finished their end of things and paid off the loan, I ended up with money back. (Please note, I do NOT, *EVER* recommend a car wreck as a way to make money. However, if it has to happen, coming out ahead on dollars was a *very* pleasant surprise.)
[Note to self: ALWAYS get the GAP insurance on a car!!!]
Having seen what the car looked like when I got out of it and knowing how little damage *I* took, it was a no-brainer to climb back into another Corolla. This time, I talked with both Enterprise and the Toyota dealership. (Shameless plug here for Kearney Mesa Toyota as their prices were better than the other dealerships and they played nicely without trying to buffalo me or treat me like an idjit!)
So, when you see me again (or, if you like, call), ask me how I got a one-owner '07 "pre-owned" CE (no unnecessary power stuff and, also, no unnecessary bills in a few years for unnecessary power stuff) w/18K miles for $12K. :D
A final note: I just checked the Enterprise site and found 7 Corollas. Three were '06 Corolla LEs with aprx. 42K miles listed at $13.5K. At the Kearney Mesa Toyota site, I found one '07 Yaris w/26.5K miles for $14K, one '08 Prius w/9K miles with a "request more info" note, and 5 Corollas from '07-05, w/5K to 30.5K miles, ranging from $14.5K to 17K. The best appears to be an '07 CE w/29K miles for $14.5K asking price.
*sigh* More edits and, it turns out, LJ cuts don't work when posting replies. So, who knew...?