(no subject)
Feb. 6th, 2008 05:39 pmMy insurance says the truck is totaled; hers hasn't looked yet, but I'm sure they'll concur. So, I'm taking suggestions on my next car! 2-4 years old, probably, fuel efficient but zippy enough for SoCal freeway driving, not too expensive. I prefer something aesthetically pleasing, but I'll take what I can get. I know some of you are car people; any tips on what to look at?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 02:00 am (UTC)you *might* be better off, especially where you are, getting a late 70s to mid 80s datsun or toyota and having a full rebuild (so, a $1,000 car with a $2,000 "make it new" - not popular, but you live in the right place to do it- no rust, no road salt, and you can get the body and interior done dirt cheap with a trip to TJ
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 02:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 03:20 am (UTC)Other than that, the Toyota Corolla is always a good bet if you can find one, as is the Honda Civic. The small Mazdas are also good cars if you can find one.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 07:37 pm (UTC)Front wheels- on front wheel drive cars the front wheels are VERY VERY moveable- as they have to be able to be driven (deliver power from the drive train to the earth) at constantly shifting angles. so it's extremely unlikely that the whole wheel and (flexible because it S tttttttttttt) drive shaft/axle assembly could come off. Bend? YES! because it is designed to- it has to to run on anything other than straight rails.
So what's keeping it "level" so to speak is the strut and shock system. if an accident breaks that system, it's probably going to look pretty ugly, like a wheel sitting at a 45 degree angle. But that's not anything in the car breaking except part of the suspension. Which is actually a good design consideration, since the suspension system gives a time-effect absortion of stress before failure.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 07:45 pm (UTC)It's looking like an '04-06 Civic Hybrid may be feasible, though.